Popular Post

Wednesday, June 1, 2011

cool backgrounds for computer desktop

cool backgrounds for computer desktop. Cool Desktop Backgrounds: go
  • Cool Desktop Backgrounds: go



  • wovel
    Apr 27, 04:13 PM
    Why does it take a media storm for Apple to open up on an issue ? It would be so much better if they more forthcoming and frank befoe an issue snowballs.

    As they said, it has been a week. It is not really there fault that the media instantly makes a storm out of every Apple issue.


    if they are not tracking people then why have the feature? maybe the information is for someone else??... who knows but one thing is for sure its an invasion of privacy..... even if I do stay home all day and night.

    It is clear from your reply you did not read the transcript or any thing else on this issue...





    cool backgrounds for computer desktop. cool wallpapers for pc.
  • cool wallpapers for pc.



  • Snookerman
    Jun 2, 05:55 AM
    Haha, I can actually hear that voice in my head "hey apple!" :p





    cool backgrounds for computer desktop. 40 Cool Wallpapers for your
  • 40 Cool Wallpapers for your



  • LaLLLy
    Apr 10, 09:48 PM
    Sure thing, enjoy!

    http://img854.imageshack.us/img854/5396/subtle12560x1440.png

    thank you!





    cool backgrounds for computer desktop. Cool+computer+desktop+
  • Cool+computer+desktop+



  • ranviper
    Oct 11, 07:28 AM
    ^What did you use to make the menubar black? I see you have white icons and not the silver ones included in the maxthemes one. :p

    And updating, with black menubar and GeekTool.

    http://cl.ly/39a3a4863a6bca0edd16/content

    Download the Application Nocturne. If you Google search Nocturne I believe its the 3rd one down from the top. There is an option within there that allows you to invert the menubar. If you don't like the orange highlights it gives you when you first invert it just check the option Invert Hue. The preferences can be accessed via the menubar icon that shows up when the app is opened. :D:D:D



    more...


    cool backgrounds for computer desktop. desktop wallpapers, a see
  • desktop wallpapers, a see



  • Slurpy2k8
    Mar 23, 11:09 AM
    First Jobs on an official vacation, jony seems to be rumored to be leaving for London, and now Serlet's gone. Man! must be something is wrong here...success getting into Apple's nerves? :confused:

    3 unrelated events, followed by a stupid conclusion. Also..

    1. Jobs has cancer, if you haven't noticed. He's on on 'vacation'. It's a health leave.
    2. Ive isn't moving to London. The rumor has been discredited.
    3. People get replaced all the time. No reason to think it's a bad thing. Lion looks awesome.





    cool backgrounds for computer desktop. Cool Desktop Backgrounds That
  • Cool Desktop Backgrounds That



  • Mudbug
    Dec 16, 08:18 PM
    I'll try and remember to make one for you tomorrow - or do you have it already?



    more...


    cool backgrounds for computer desktop. on your desktop.
  • on your desktop.



  • iStudentUK
    Mar 15, 04:56 PM
    We can hope!

    I wonder if there will be a critical point where enough states get rid of it so the rest follow?





    cool backgrounds for computer desktop. Desktop Backgrounds Cool free
  • Desktop Backgrounds Cool free



  • FX4568
    Apr 4, 10:24 PM
    Phew. Thanks for clearing that up for us. Until you explained it so well I was really worried.

    Well, this is macrumors and i try to stay away from economic theories, but you asked for it, so here we go:
    Monopolies cause "allocative deadweight loss" (although its main argument applies towards state-owned enterprises)
    What does that mean?

    In a competitive market, producers dont have the freedom to set a price because the rival can always undercut them until the point where lowering the price will cause in a loss.
    BUT the monopolist firm can decide the price it charges by varying the quantity it produces, so it will produce only up to the quantity where its profit is maximized. UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES, the level of output is lower than the socially optimal one, which is where the max price a consumer is willing to pay is the same as the minimum price that the producer requires in order not to lose money.
    When the amount produced is LESS than the socially optimal quantity, it means not serving some consumers who are perfectly willing to pay MORE than the minimum price that the producer requires but who are unwilling to bear the price at which the monopoly firm can max its profit. The unfulfilled desire of those neglected consumers is the social cost of monopoly.

    So basically, monopolies will start losing more money when they start raising the price since consumers will either 1) not be able to access such services (since they will only make the MIN amount for MAX price and by using calculus, you would rather spend a little more in the amount produced and make a little less profit rather than having an EXACT amount although you would make the best profit IF you sold ALL items) or 2) consumers will just stop using it since cell phone devices are not a NECESSITY but instead a WANT. do you think you will pay whatever cellphone company if the price exceeds a certain comfort zone in your income bracket? you wont.

    Furthermore, I will take it one more step. Monopolies can be good. If you look at the Mexican carrier, Telcel. The year Telcel was monopolized by Carlos Slim (riches man in the world now) coverage in Mexico grew more than it did in the hands of the state. According to the "monopoly=bad" argument, service in Mexico should have dropped in every other city that is not important in Mexico's economy while service should have exploded in cities such as Mexico City and Puebla. No, it exploded in the main cities while it also exploded with the whole country

    In conclusion, monopolies are only dangerous IF the monopoly is a necessity based. i.e. lets say one man owned the whole united states food supply. Then yes, monopolies would be the worst. But not cell phone companies, cmon if monopolies were SOO good for the company why would Bell even break up his own company? just for the lulz? I dont think so. Because the government told him so? I certainly dont believe it since Bell probably would have had the power to lobby his way out and in case nothing worked he couldve just brought it up to the Supreme Court.

    Anyways, enough with the economics jargon. Enjoy your economics class :P



    more...


    cool backgrounds for computer desktop. Your Ad Here
  • Your Ad Here



  • zildjansg
    Sep 10, 11:53 PM
    on my alu Macbook
    http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3092/2901412366_ebfa285dce_o.jpg
    on my mac mini
    http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3113/2903560247_a368e63a81_b.jpg





    cool backgrounds for computer desktop. Computer desktop wallpaper
  • Computer desktop wallpaper



  • atr-drivr
    Dec 14, 07:40 PM
    deleted..



    more...


    cool backgrounds for computer desktop. Cool desktop backgrounds
  • Cool desktop backgrounds



  • gugy
    Jul 28, 04:44 PM
    Interesting that you had problems with your cds. Usually I never encountered such a thing. I take care of them but not spend too much time worrying about it. Lots of my work are backed up on cd's and dvds as early as the 90's.
    I agreed that having a Hard Drive backup is a good thing. I am interested in the high capacity of the BR and HD-DVD discs, but I refuse to pay $50 for a disc. I rather buy at Fry's on promotion a 300GB hard drive for $89. Much better deal.

    Until then I think Hard drives are the way to go to archive huge files. It will be interesting when these new dvd discs cost around $5 for 50GB, then I will jump on it.





    cool backgrounds for computer desktop. 30 Cool Wallpapers For Your
  • 30 Cool Wallpapers For Your



  • bense27
    Nov 24, 09:18 AM
    So, a second generation of a product that doesn't even exist.

    hahahahaha



    more...


    cool backgrounds for computer desktop. the order of the. Free
  • the order of the. Free



  • mikejd1
    Feb 9, 10:25 AM
    so this is only unlimited "to" any mobile, what about "From"





    cool backgrounds for computer desktop. If you know of anymore cool
  • If you know of anymore cool



  • hobo.hopkins
    Apr 27, 05:01 PM
    ....because Apple says nothing and allows it to fester.

    It's been a week; a week is hardly enough time for anything to fester.



    more...


    cool backgrounds for computer desktop. computer desktop. Free
  • computer desktop. Free



  • HexMonkey
    Nov 4, 04:05 PM
    I've created a draft of a Style Guide (http://guides.macrumors.com/Help:Style_Guide). Most of the guidelines there are just what I thought was best, so are not final yet. Some are based on discussions in existing threads.

    Feel free to edit or provide feedback.





    cool backgrounds for computer desktop. Computer desktop wallpaper
  • Computer desktop wallpaper



  • drmacpro
    Aug 7, 05:04 PM
    http://browse.deviantart.com/customization/?qh=&section=&q=pixar#/d2d663t

    All the desktop Widgets, could some one name them?



    more...


    cool backgrounds for computer desktop. Computer desktop wallpaper
  • Computer desktop wallpaper



  • legacyb4
    Sep 27, 08:58 AM
    Super short domain name...

    the attraction here with a .mac account





    cool backgrounds for computer desktop. cool backgrounds for your
  • cool backgrounds for your



  • BeamWalker
    Aug 4, 09:08 AM
    that dog link please?:D:)

    You can get it at Deviantart (http://eugenio1.deviantart.com/art/Dug-Wallpaper-147578291)





    cool backgrounds for computer desktop. christmas desktop wallpaper
  • christmas desktop wallpaper



  • chris975d
    Nov 19, 01:40 PM
    Can Apple really stop TJ Maxx from selling their iPads?

    I thought the Authorised Reseller Programme was just that: an "Apple-certified" or "Apple-approved" reseller? Surely any reseller who doesn't have this "sign of approval" still can sell the iPad?

    I don't really know the answer to that since every store which I've seen here in the UK which sells Apple products are authorised resellers.

    Sorry if it's obvious, it's just that the response makes it sound like only retailers approved by Apple can sell their products; sort of like a cease and desist threat.

    No, again, Apple can't stop them from selling the iPad. But it does mean that the iPads TJ Maxx is getting aren't being acquired directly from Apple. It means that they are buying them from a 3rd party. All Apple COULD do is terminate the 3rd party's Apple account (meaning that the 3rd party can no longer purchase directly from Apple) if they want to (if it was a large enough sale to TJ Maxx...80 iPads probably won't matter to Apple). An "Apple approved" retailer is one that has been authorized by Apple to buy Apple products directly from Apple, and thereby get all of the advertising perks, merchandising, etc from Apple.





    DeathChill
    Apr 22, 10:58 PM
    ?

    What you're saying makes no sense. If they're the same, why do they need different versions of the same application? Do different versions of the same application exist for the different flavors of windows 7? Are there different versions of the same application for laptops and desktop computers?

    Can't iOS applications share the same code base with adjustments made for the differing UI requirements (e.g. iPad vs iPhone resolution).

    Regardless, the iPad can run iPhone/iPod touch applications anyways so your distinction is silly.





    Thnkdifferent
    Mar 4, 01:14 AM
    I really like the concept HP has done with their up coming slate/Pre integration. Being able to respond to a text while on my iPad would be awesome. Anyone hear of an app that can do this? If not lets get one going :)





    jrko
    Apr 26, 04:13 PM
    Top left corner of GPU looks burnt to me. Maybe it's bad picture quality, but if it's burnt really (what makes it DOA), it may explain why thermal paste is baked on.


    yeah it is baked and burnt but seller say its tested as working





    Huntn
    May 5, 11:09 AM
    So, what do you call, and how do we handle the individual(s)who planned, and helped to plan the death of 3,000 + individuals on 9/11, the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole, the Bali nightclub bombings, and who knows how many more acts of terrorism?


    Can you honestly sit there and tell me that when we have in custody a high profile leader such as K.S.M. who has intricate, first hand knowledge of a terrorist organization that we should not do all that we can to obtain as much information from this person as possible? I suppose your thinking (and those of many others here) is that he should have been given a trial by jury, sent to prison, and that we had no right to try and obtain information from him?

    Do you want to enjoy individual civil liberties, known as "rights" or are you willing to live in a police state to ensure your safety? Police states are good for the security of the state and those in power, but individuals are less secure.





    twoodcc
    Jan 29, 06:21 PM
    Well that was fun ....
    I am not entirely sure everything is running right, i am doing one work unit every 26 hours on the mac... its the SMP client and its a dual core 2.8ghz .. i get the feeling if i were running it on my bootcamp partion it would be better plus then i could utilize the graphics processer as well


    however i installed ubuntu on the other 3.06ghz pc and well lets say that folding doesn't like it ... so i am now installing open Suse... so far so good ...

    Selected Unit:



    No comments:

    Post a Comment